{"id":1561,"date":"2019-05-20T00:00:36","date_gmt":"2019-05-19T22:00:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/?page_id=1561"},"modified":"2019-10-24T13:02:24","modified_gmt":"2019-10-24T11:02:24","slug":"sessions","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/?page_id=1561","title":{"rendered":"Parallel Sessions"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\u00a0Parallel Sessions on October 28, 2019, 13.30 \u2013 15.30:
\n<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Session title<\/strong><\/td>\nSpeakers, discussants and moderators<\/strong><\/td>\nCentral questions and session topics<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S1) Combining Social Innovation and Technological Development: A Holistic Innovation Process<\/td>\nMatthias Weber (AIT),
\nAntonius Schr\u00f6der (ESSI), Ralf Kopp (TU Dortmund University), Elena Como (LAMA), Birgit Thomson (BAUA Dortmund)<\/td>\n		Overview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Introduction\/Input<\/strong>:
\nTechnological and Social Innovation: Different approaches?!<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • Statement from a technological innovation perspective: Matthias Weber (AIT Vienna)<\/li>\n
  • Statement from a social innovation perspective: Antonius Schr\u00f6der (TU Dortmund University)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Questionnaire<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

    Plenary voting by sli.do<\/p>\n

    Presentations<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Contours of a socio-digital transformation approach (Ralf Kopp, TU Dortmund University)<\/li>\n
    2. Technological support for social innovations (Elena Como, LAMA Florence)<\/li>\n
    3. New leadership requirements in times of digital transformation (Birgit Thomson, BAUA Dortmund)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Round table \/ panel discussion:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Outlook: How can we better combine Technological and Social Innovation?<\/p>\n

      Methods<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

      provocative inputs, presentations, questionnaire, panel and round table discussion<\/td>\n

Stahlhalle
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S2) Social Innovation Diffusion and Societal Transition<\/td>\nModerators:<\/p>\n

Anna Butzin (IAT) \/
\nJulia Wittmayer (DRIFT)<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Speakers:<\/p>\n

Maria Rabadjieva (Institute for Work and Technology, Gelsenkirchen), Bonno Pel (Universite Libre de Bruxelles)<\/p>\n

Karoline Rogge (Fraunhofer ISI\/SPRU),<\/p>\n

Anna Butzin (Institute for Work and Technology, Gelsenkirchen)<\/td>\n

Which are the ways through which social innovation diffuse or gain impact? Answers are manifold, fuzzy and sometimes even contradictory. They often relate to concepts such as diffusion, translation, scaling, mainstreaming or institutionalization. Against this background, the aim of the session is to critically discussing the different concepts in order to shed light on social innovation diffusion.<\/p>\n

The sessions hosts the following four presentations:<\/p>\n

\u201cSocial Innovation Diffusion between Practice and Field\u201d (Maria Rabadjieva)<\/p>\n

\u201cMainstreaming Renewable Energy Prosumerism: Directionality of an ongoing Transition\u201d (Bonno Pel) \u201cBridging social innovation and policy mix research: an exploration for the case of social innovation in energy transitions\u201d (Karoline Rogge)<\/p>\n

\u201cSocial innovation diffusion as multi-local problem and solution setting\u201d (Anna Butzin, Hugues Jeannerat)<\/p>\n

The session will follow a \u2018classic\u2019 set-up: each presenter has 25 minutes for presenting and answering questions. The last 20 minutes will be dedicated to a common discussion and overall wrap-up of the session.<\/td>\n

Seminarraum 1
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S3) Socio-digital Transformation of Work: Beyond the Future of Work<\/td>\nSteven Dhondt (TNO), Frank Pot, (Radboud University Nijmegen), Michael Kohlgr\u00fcber (TU Dortmund University), Clara Behrend (TU Dortmund University), Ursula Holtgrewe (ZSI), \u00a0Nela \u0160alamon (ZSI), Wolfgang Haider (ZSI), Sabine Pfeiffer (Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-N\u00farnberg)<\/td>\nOverview:<\/strong><\/p>\n
    \n
  • Preliminary results of Beyond 4.0 (led by Steven Dhondt and Michael Kohlgr\u00fcber)<\/li>\n
  • Preliminary results of Paradigms 4.0 (led by Steven Dhondt)<\/li>\n
  • Final results of Shaping Industrial Relations in a Digitalising Services Industry (led by Steven Dhondt and Ursula Holtgrewe)<\/li>\n
  • Future of research into digitalisation and Industry 4.0 (led by Frank Pot, Steven Dhondt and Sabine Pfeiffer)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Methods: <\/strong><\/p>\n

    presentations, conversations and panel discussions<\/td>\n

Talenthaus
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S4) Digital Social Innovation for an Inclusive Society<\/td>\nChristoph Kaletka (TU Dortmund University),
\nBastian Pelka (TU Dortmund University),Vanessa Heitplatz (TU Dortmund University \/ Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences), Ingo Bosse (TU Dortmund University \/ Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences), Aitziber Mugarra (University of DEUSTO), Cruz Borjesare (University of DEUSTO)<\/td>\n		Overview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The panel will discuss (digital) social innovations and their contributions to a society in which everybody can participate. Many social innovation initiatives work for (and often with) marginalized groups. These initiatives, projects and networks drive a process of empowerment in which marginalized groups become actors instead of passive beneficiaries. Participatory examples and initiatives supporting the inclusion of marginalized groups into society will be presented and discussed in the panel.<\/p>\n

Contributions will address:<\/em><\/p>\n

    \n
  • makerspaces and especially \u201cinclusive making\u201d by people with disabilities,<\/li>\n
  • social robots and their inclusive potential for patients and elderly people, and<\/li>\n
  • community empowering open technologies with people with disabilities as protagonists.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    The panel will discuss the innovative character of such initiatives, and especially the relation between traditional \/ technological innovation on the one hand, and social innovation \/ new practices on the other hand.<\/td>\n

Seminarraum 2
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S5) The Role of Social Innovation for Sustainable Development<\/td>\nJeremy Millard (DTI), Doris Schartinger (AIT), Olatz Ukar (University of DEUSTO), Hector Barco (University of DEUSTO), Marta Enciso (University of DEUSTO), Rick H\u00f6lsgens (TU Dortmund University)<\/td>\nOverview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Main topics:<\/em><\/p>\n

    \n
  • The European and global context of how social innovation is necessary to underpin social, economic and environmental sustainability for a viable inter-generational compact<\/li>\n
  • The role of social innovation for climate change and the environment<\/li>\n
  • Social innovation for poverty reduction and the promotion of economically and socially sustainable development<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Presentations:
    \n<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    • Introduction<\/em> and the social sustainability perspective: Jeremy Millard (DTI)<\/li>\n
    • Introduction<\/em> and the environmental and economic sustainability perspective: Doris Schartinger (AIT)<\/li>\n
    • First participants\u2019 session<\/em>: answer and formulate questions\/views with your neighbours, then use sli.do or similar to create word cloud\/answer simple questions to help guide the session.<\/li>\n
    • Presentation<\/em>: Keys to achieve the SDG 12.3: social innovation challenge of reducing the current Food Wastage in the European Union (Olatz Ukar, Hector Barco, Marta Enciso\/ DEUSTO)<\/li>\n
    • Presentation<\/em>: Social innovation and climate change (Rick H\u00f6lsgens\/ TU Dortmund)<\/li>\n
    • Round table \/ panel discussion<\/em> (4 main speakers plus 2-3 participant provocateurs from first participants\u2019 session and open Q&A): what are the strengths\/weaknesses of social innovation for achieving sustainability and how can these be exploited\/addressed?<\/li>\n
    • Final participants\u2019 session<\/em>: what can we do personally as social innovators and what can others\/society do to create a viable inter-generational compact?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Methods:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Presentations, audience participation, panel and round table discussion<\/td>\n

Gefahrstoffhalle
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S6) Measurement of Social Innovation<\/td>\nJudith Terstriep (IAT),
\nSimone Strambach (Philipps-Universit\u00e4t Marburg),
\nPeter Oeij (TNO)<\/td>\n		Overview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The differences and commonalities between technological and social innovations have not yet been clarified in detail. Thus, the measurement of social innovations is a challenging but important issue to gain deeper insights into the forms and processes of social innovation and their spatial shaping.<\/p>\n

This session provides a platform to theoretically and empirically discuss approaches to measuring social innovation at micro-, meso- and\/or macro-level from an organizational, spatial, societal perspective.<\/p>\n

Introduction<\/strong>: Why SI measurement matters!<\/p>\n

    \n
  • Statement from an social and economic perspective: Judith Terstriep (IAT Gelsenkirchen)<\/li>\n
  • Statement from a spatial perspective: Simone Strambach (Philipps-University Marburg)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Presentations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Measuring organisational social innovativeness (Maria Kleverback & Laura-Fee Wloka, Westphalian University Gelsenkirchen, IAT)<\/li>\n
    2. Measuring social innovation in regional contexts (Gorgi Krlev, University Heidelberg, CSI)<\/li>\n
    3. Measuring resonance and trend potential of social innovation in an early stage (Jan-Frederik Thurmann, Philipps-University Marburg)<\/li>\n
    4. Measuring cases of social innovation using Qualitative Comparative Analysis: moving away from anecdotalism towards sensemaking patterns (Peter Oeij, TNO)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Panel discussion:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      What are the strengths and weaknesses of the introduced approaches to measure social innovation in its different facets and manifestations from varying perspectives?<\/p>\n

      Outlook:<\/em><\/p>\n

      What are the essential ingredients of an indicator system that makes it possible to observe continuously entrepreneurial and non-entrepreneurial social innovation activities at the European level?<\/p>\n

      Methods:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Proactive inputs, presentations, panel discussion, voting\/questionnaire<\/td>\n

Vortragssaal
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Parallel Sessions on October 29, 2019, 11:00 \u2013 12.30:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Session title<\/strong><\/td>\nSpeakers, discussants and moderators<\/strong><\/td>\nCentral questions and session topics<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S7) Co-Creation in Policy Making and Technology Development<\/td>\nAlessandro Deserti (Polytecnico di Milano), Francesca Rizzo (Polytecnico di Milano),
\nChristoph Kaletka (TU Dortmund University), Kyriaki Papageorgiou (ESADE Business School), Andr\u00e9 Martinuzzi (Institute for Managing Sustainability, WU Vienna)<\/td>\n		Overview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Co-creation describes innovation processes in which different actors work together towards an outcome from which everybody benefits. Taking into account the variety of understandings in various disciplines, it addresses non-linear processes which
\ninvolve multiple actors and stakeholders in different phases of the innovation process, such as ideation, implementation and assessment of technologies, services, or policies. Co-creation can involve participants from different societal sectors (enterprises, researchers, policy-makers, civil society), disciplinary backgrounds, or departments of a company.<\/p>\n

The session will discuss latest research findings on co-creation in policy-making on the one hand, and in technological domains such as robotics, urban energy and autonomous driving on the other hand. The presenters will reflect upon what can make co-creation successful, and introduce different examples. On this basis, session participants will discuss favourable conditions that support the introduction and scalability of co-creation.<\/td>\n

Seminarraum 2
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S8) Ecosystems of Social Innovation<\/td>\nModerators:<\/p>\n

Antonia Caro (University of DEUSTO) \/
\nArtur Serra (i2cat)<\/p>\n

Panel:<\/p>\n

Aitor Almeida (University of DEUSTO) \/ Jordi Colobrans (i2CAT Foundation – Catlabs) \/ Marta Enciso (University of DEUSTO) \/ Susan Halford (Bristol Digital Futures Institute) \/ Marita Holst (Lule\u00e5 University of Technology) \/ Andrei Po (Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences) \/ Andrea Ricci\u00a0 (ISINNOVA – SHAPE_ID) \/ Dimitra Simeonidou (Bristol Digital Futures Institute) \/ Jack Spaapen (KNAW-The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)<\/td>\n

Overview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Many SI initiatives are incepted, grow and flourish alongside the development of collaborative\u00a0endeavors\u00a0that connect different types of stakeholders around a given social need or challenge within a context.\u00a0The idea for the panel is to discuss the potential of SI to generate these productive interactive networks\u00a0and ecosystems that have the capacity to adapt, learn\u00a0and evolve over time.<\/p>\n

The panel will invite\u00a0successful existing\u00a0experiences\u00a0of emerging SI ecosystems with a twofold aim:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. to explore the potential of SI ecosystems to align people, goals, timeframes, andinterests, and,<\/li>\n
  2. to learn from the main features of SI living models,\u00a0 for example<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n
    • the glocal network promoted by the Urbegi group in the Basque Country, an ecosystem based on engagement and user incentives to develop active communities for the creation of collaborative projects;<\/li>\n
    • the Catlabs collaboratory, a program connecting living labs, fab labs, telecenters with the official R&i system in Catalonia in order to generate a “universal innovation ecosystems”.<\/li>\n
    • the concept of ‘nested systems’ for collaborative impactful research aims to promote innovative ways to connect stakeholders in research, innovation, and society to respond to societal challenges; and finally,<\/li>\n
    • some lessons learned from the analysis on interdisciplinary collaborative frameworks like the SHAPE_ID project.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      We would like to discuss, among other things, the innovative character of such initiatives, and especially the relationship between traditional approaches of the R&I ecosystems and the social innovation new practices that are generating interactive SI ecosystems in different fields and contexts.<\/td>\n

Stahlhalle
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S9) Social Innovation as a Challenge for Higher Education Institutions<\/td>\nMark Majewsky Anderson (Glasgow Caledonian University), Dmitri Domanski (Business Metropole Ruhr), Anne de Bruin (Massey University)<\/td>\nOverview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The low engagement of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in social innovation is in strong contrast to their essential role as knowledge providers, promoters and facilitators in classical innovation processes and as one actor of the triple helix model. At the same time, we can observe that the role of HEIs has evolved in recent years. There is an increasing number of universities developing new paradigms in teaching, research and outreach, demonstrating the huge potential of academia in fostering social innovation.<\/p>\n

Against this background, we are going to discuss these questions, among others:<\/p>\n

    \n
  • What are the main barriers for HEIs to successfully engage in social innovation?<\/li>\n
  • How can HEIs advance responsible innovation?<\/li>\n
  • How can HEIs contribute to knowledge exchange within an ecosystem?<\/li>\n
  • What are the other functions of HEIs in the area of social innovation?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Presentations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    • Insights on the Role of Academia\u00a0and\u00a0HEI in Advancing Social Innovation and Responsible Innovation (Anne de Bruin)<\/li>\n
    • Supporting social innovation at a \u2018Glocal\u2019 level: The role of HEIs (Mark Anderson)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Methods:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      We will use an interactive format to discuss the role of HEIs in social innovation.<\/td>\n

Gefahrstoffhalle
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S10) The Role of Social Sciences and Humanities in Processes of Societal Transformation<\/td>\nKlaus Schuch (ZSI\/Moderator), Jack Harrington (Wellcome Trust), Ursula Holtgrewe (ZSI), Jeremy Millard (DTI), Goret Paulo (FGV), Isabel R\u00f6ssler (CHE)<\/td>\nOverview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Main topics:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • The role of SSH in transformative R&I policies<\/li>\n
  • Thematic and procedual contributions of SSH to societal transformation<\/li>\n
  • Social innovation in the SSH impact discourse<\/li>\n
  • Accountability of social innovation in higher education and R&I programmes<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Presentations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      \n
    • We need a Fourth Social Revolution, underpinned by SSH, to lead the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Jeremy Millard\/DTI)<\/li>\n
    • Tracing the impact between university-based research, teaching and social innovation (Isabel Roessler\/CHE – Centre for Higher Education)<\/li>\n
    • A roadmap for research about\/for\/with social innovation (Ursula Holtgrewe\/ZSI)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      Panel discussion (audience is invited to take part in it):<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Jack Harrington (Wellcome Trust), Ursula Holtgrewe (ZSI \u2013 Centre for Social Innovation), Jeremy Millard (DTI), Goret Pereira Paulo (Funda\u00e7\u00e3o Getulio Vargas), Isabel Roessler (CHE), Klaus Schuch (ZSI\/Moderator)<\/p>\n

      Methods:<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Presentations, panel discussion, audience participation, voting by mentimeter or similar.<\/td>\n

Seminarraum 1
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S11) Labs and Spaces for Public Sector Innovation<\/td>\nJ\u00fcrgen Schultze (TU Dortmund University), Lindsay Cole (City of Vancouver, Solutions Lab), Arne Elias (City of Dortmund, Economic Development Agency), Eva Wascher (TU Dortmund University)<\/td>\nOverview:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Public Sector Innovation Labs (PSI-Labs) are a means to tackle complex, adaptive problems by providing dedicated space, competence and methods for multi-actor, cross-sector cooperation. More and more PSI-Labs are established especially to work on urban and municipal challenges. What is the specificity in organisational structures, innovation processes as well as networks and spaces that PSI-Labs at city-level operate in?<\/p>\n

The session participants get to know two different lab approaches in the City of Vancouver and Dortmund and will discuss ways in which \u2018innovation learning\u2019 is performed in the public sector.<\/p>\n

Presentations:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • Introduction: Governance Labs \u2013 Transaction Cost and Added Value in Future Orientated Public Services (J\u00fcrgen Schultze)<\/li>\n
  • Building a Public Sector Innovation Lab in the City of Vancouver (Lindsay Cole)<\/li>\n
  • Building a Social Innovation Center in the City of Dortmund (Dr. Arne Elias)<\/li>\n
  • Social Innovation Labs as an Instrument of Collaborative Governance (Eva Wascher)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    Methods:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Short presentations + dialogic format with creative disruption<\/td>\n

Vortragssaal
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(S12) Year One of the Lisbon Declaration: Achievements and Future Perspectives<\/td>\nSophie Reynolds (NESTA) \/ Louise Pulford (SIX)<\/td>\ntba<\/td>\nTalenthaus
\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0Parallel Sessions on October 28, 2019, 13.30 \u2013 15.30: Session title Speakers, discussants and moderators Central questions and session topics Room (S1) Combining Social Innovation and Technological Development: A Holistic Innovation Process Matthias Weber (AIT), Antonius Schr\u00f6der (ESSI), Ralf Kopp (TU Dortmund University), Elena Como (LAMA), Birgit Thomson (BAUA Dortmund) Overview: Introduction\/Input: Technological and Social […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1561","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1561"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1896,"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1561\/revisions\/1896"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.essi-net.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}